The file size does not reflect the real database size. In fact, after deleting entries from a table, the file is not shrunk; Instead, it contains unallocated space that the engine will reuse by the next occasion.

Size in inches: Get current size via: Fig. get_size_inches() and change it via fig. set_size_inches(). If the size of the int is that important one can use int16_t, int32_t and int64_t (need the iostream include for that if i remember correctly). What's nice about this that int64_t should not have issues on a 32bit รขโ‚ฌยฆ In this case, depending upon what your use case is, you might be better off using int (or long long) for s1 and s2. There are some functions in c/posix that could/should use size_t, but don't because of รขโ‚ฌยฆ

What's nice about this that int64_t should not have issues on a 32bit รขโ‚ฌยฆ In this case, depending upon what your use case is, you might be better off using int (or long long) for s1 and s2. There are some functions in c/posix that could/should use size_t, but don't because of รขโ‚ฌยฆ So, the size of size_t is not specified, only that it has to be an unsigned integer type. However, an interesting specification can be found in chapter 7. 18. 3 of the standard: Limit of size_t size_max รขโ‚ฌยฆ In several c++ examples i see a use of the type size_t where i would have used a simple int. What's the difference, and why size_t should be better?

Limit of size_t size_max รขโ‚ฌยฆ In several c++ examples i see a use of the type size_t where i would have used a simple int. What's the difference, and why size_t should be better?